← Back to Samples
Asteroid City poster

ASTEROID CITY(2023)

Written by: [Not found on cover page]

Draft date: Not specified.

Genre: Comedy

Recommend

Title: Asteroid City

Written by: [Not found on cover page]

Draft date: Not specified.

LOGLINE

In a tiny desert town in 1955, a widowed war photographer, his genius teenage son, a famous movie star, and a group of young science prodigies gather for a stargazing competition — only to have their lives upended when an alien descends and steals the town's prized meteorite, triggering a government quarantine that forces the strangers into unexpected intimacy with each other and their own grief.

Very PoorPoorFairGoodExcellent
PREMISE
STRUCTURE
CHARACTER
CONFLICT
DIALOGUE
PACING
TONE
ORIGINALITY
LOGIC
CRAFT
Strong PassPassConsiderRecommendStrong Recommend
Overall

Genre: Drama, Comedy

Sub-genre: Ensemble Drama, Metatheatrical Drama, Period Drama

Keywords: Ensemble Cast, 1950s Setting, Alien Encounter, Grief, Father-Son, Science, Desert Setting, Meta-Narrative, Play-Within-a-Play, Government Cover-Up, Quarantine, Coming-of-Age, Romance, Family, Fish-Out-Of-Water, Americana

MPA Rating: PG-13 (mild language, brief nudity in an artistic context, thematic content involving death and grief, mild violence during a riot scene)

Budget Tier: High ($40M–$100M) — period-accurate 1950s desert town construction, observatory, crater set, spacecraft/alien effects, black-and-white television studio framing device, freight train sequences, large ensemble cast, multiple elaborate sets including theatre proscenium, Ferris wheel, military barricades, and fireworks.

Pages: 118

Time Period: 1955 over approximately 10 days (desert storyline); unspecified mid-20th century theatrical world (framing device). Roughly 70% in 1955 desert setting / 30% in black-and-white theatrical framing sequences.

Locations: 70% in a tiny fictional desert town ("Asteroid City") requiring a luncheonette, motel with individual bungalows (one burned to cinder), gas station, meteor crater with observatory, desert landscapes, railroad crossing, and military barricades. 30% in black-and-white theatrical settings: a 1950s television studio soundstage, a theatre proscenium (front and backstage), a seaside beach house writer's study, an overnight train sleeping compartment, a rehearsal classroom, and a backstage alley between two theatres. Period vehicles (Cadillac Eldorado, station wagons, Army Jeeps, freight trains). Alien spacecraft and alien prosthetic requirements.

Lead: Augie Steenbeck — Male, early 40s, white, small, bearded, quiet and emotionally guarded war photographer recently widowed, given to self-conscious actorly business with his pipe and camera.

Comparables: The Royal Tenenbaums (Wes Anderson's ensemble of wounded, gifted characters navigating family grief with deadpan humor and precise visual style), Synecdoche, New York (Charlie Kaufman's metatheatrical layering where the boundaries between life, art, and performance dissolve), Close Encounters of the Third Kind (ordinary people transformed by alien contact in a government-controlled environment), Our Town (Thornton Wilder's theatrical exploration of everyday life, death, and cosmic perspective through self-conscious stagecraft).

SYNOPSIS

A HOST (50s) introduces a black-and-white television broadcast that promises to take viewers behind the scenes of a new theatrical production called "Asteroid City." He explains that the play does not exist — it is a fictional drama created for this broadcast. The HOST introduces CONRAD EARP (50), a playwright from Wyoming, who begins reading his new play aloud to a company of actors at the Tarkington Theatre.

The play opens in widescreen color. In the tiny desert town of Asteroid City, population 87, AUGIE STEENBECK (early 40s), a bearded war photographer, arrives with his gangly son WOODROW (14) and three young daughters — ANDROMEDA (6), PANDORA (5), and CASSIOPEIA (4) — their station wagon broken down and towed in by a grizzled MECHANIC (40s). The Mechanic attempts a repair, but the car suffers a catastrophic and mysterious mechanical failure, stranding the family. Augie calls his father-in-law STANLEY ZAK (65), a wealthy retiree, to come collect the girls. During the call, it becomes clear Augie has not yet told his children that their mother died three weeks ago. Stanley urges him to tell them.

Other families arrive for the annual "Asteroid Day" celebration: MIDGE CAMPBELL (late 30s), a glamorous movie star, with her sharp-tongued daughter DINAH (15); advertising executive J.J. KELLOGG (late 40s) with his daredevil son CLIFFORD (14); scientist ROGER CHO (50) with journalist son RICKY (15); and Cookie Troopers regional headmistress SANDY BORDEN (45) with star-struck daughter SHELLY (14). A schoolteacher named JUNE (30s) arrives by bus with her class of eight-year-olds and two chaperones. A cowboy named MONTANA lingers after his bus departs.

Augie finally tells his children their mother has died. He presents her ashes in a Tupperware salad bowl. The family absorbs the news with grief and confusion. GENERAL GIBSON (mid-50s), a five-star officer, presides over the Asteroid Day ceremonies, awarding medals to the five teenage science prodigies for their inventions. Woodrow's holographic moon-projection device earns particular admiration. DR. HICKENLOOPER (50), the observatory astronomer, leads the group in viewing an Astronomical Ellipses that night.

During the celestial viewing, an alien spacecraft descends into the crater. A tall, red-orange ALIEN climbs down, picks up the meteorite, poses for Augie's camera, and departs into space. General Gibson receives orders to implement a quarantine under National Security Emergency Scrimmage Plan X, detaining all witnesses for medical and psychological examination and publicly denying the event.

The narrative cuts periodically to the black-and-white framing device. The playwright meets the actor JONES HALL (30s) who will play Augie, and their instant artistic connection is dramatized. The actress MERCEDES FORD, who plays Midge, nearly abandons the production but is retrieved by the young understudy who replaces the original Woodrow. The director SCHUBERT GREEN (40s), whose wife POLLY (late 30s) is leaving him, moves into a makeshift bedroom backstage and lives at the theatre for the entire run.

Back in the play: quarantine life unfolds. The teenagers bond through memory games, and Woodrow and Dinah develop a tender romance. Ricky breaks the alien story to his school newspaper, exposing the military cover-up. The parents debate extraterrestrial life and argue with soldiers. Augie and Midge develop an intimate connection through their opposing bathroom windows — she rehearses scenes with him, performs a nude monologue, and they sleep together. Midge observes that they are "two catastrophically wounded people who don't express the depths of their pain." Augie inexplicably burns his hand on a hot plate, an action neither he nor the playwright fully understands.

Montana courts June through gentle interactions with her students. The MOTEL MANAGER (40s) sells questionable land parcels through a vending machine. The three sisters conduct a makeshift funeral for their mother's ashes behind the cabin, which Stanley tries and fails to exhume. J.J. confronts Clifford's compulsive daring as a cry for attention. Dr. Hickenlooper becomes Woodrow's mentor, encouraging his scientific curiosity.

The alien returns, dropping the meteorite back — now labeled with alien inventory markings — then departs again. General Gibson attempts to re-impose the quarantine, but the congregation riots, using the teenagers' confiscated science projects as weapons. Augie, confused, breaks character and exits through the painted backdrop.

In the black-and-white world, the actor playing Augie confronts the director backstage, confessing he does not understand the play. The director tells him to keep going. In an alley, the actor encounters the actress who played Augie's dead wife — her scene was cut — and she recites their deleted dialogue from memory. In the playwright's classroom, students chant "You can't wake up if you don't fall asleep" as the alien watches from the stage.

The quarantine lifts. The town empties overnight. Stanley, Augie, Woodrow, and the girls bury the Tupperware ashes permanently, eat flapjacks, and learn Woodrow won the Hickenlooper Scholarship. Midge has left her address for Augie. The family climbs into Stanley's Eldorado and drives away into the desert.

COMMENTS

PREMISE — Good

The premise operates on two interlocking levels: a 1955 desert alien encounter that forces a group of grieving, gifted, and emotionally stunted people into intimate proximity, and a metatheatrical frame examining how art processes experiences that defy comprehension. The central dramatic question — "Why does Augie burn his hand on the Quicky-Griddle?" — is deliberately unanswerable, which positions the material as a meditation on grief, meaning-making, and the inadequacy of understanding rather than a conventional narrative with a solvable problem. This is both the premise's greatest strength and its most significant risk: it demands that the emotional textures of the ensemble carry the audience through a structure that explicitly refuses resolution. The alien encounter provides a brilliant metaphorical engine — an event so incomprehensible it mirrors the characters' inability to process death — and the quarantine supplies the necessary confinement to force relationships. The premise is rich, layered, and intellectually ambitious, occupying territory between Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Our Town, though its refusal to privilege any single character's journey over the ensemble's collective bewilderment means it stakes everything on tonal and emotional precision rather than narrative momentum.

STRUCTURE — Fair

The three-act structure of the play-within-the-play is clearly delineated — Friday morning, the next day, one week later — and the metatheatrical frame punctuates it at roughly proportional intervals, though these interruptions serve thematic rather than structural purposes. The inciting incident (the alien's descent) lands around page 48-49, which at approximately 41% of the total page count is notably late for a catalyst, meaning the material spends its first substantial portion on character introduction and tonal establishment. The midpoint effectively arrives with the quarantine and its consequences (62-66), and the alien's return at approximately page 104-105 functions as the break into the final movement. The structural challenge is that the metatheatrical sequences — the playwright meeting the actor (50-54), the actress on the train (55-58), the director's backstage life (59-61), the acting class (84-88) — while individually compelling, interrupt forward momentum in the desert narrative each time emotional pressure is building. The resolution is deliberately anticlimactic: the quarantine lifts offscreen (113), and the family simply leaves. This structural choice is thematically coherent — life resumes without answers — but it means the final fifteen pages diffuse rather than concentrate dramatic energy. The earliest pages (3-6) accomplish their world-building with elegant economy, establishing the frame device and transitioning to color/widescreen with clear theatrical logic.

CHARACTER — Good

Augie is defined through absence — absence of his wife, absence of emotional expressiveness, absence of understanding — and his arc traces the distance between suppressing grief and beginning to acknowledge it, though the resolution is pointedly incomplete. His backstory is efficiently established through the Tupperware revelation (18-19), his shrapnel scar (22), and the lipstick-stained cigarette butt (15), and his want (to get through this period with his children) conflicts productively with his need (to feel something). Woodrow emerges as a more dynamically drawn character than his father: his intellectual intensity, his quiet grief, his budding romance with Dinah, and his existential excitement about the alien create a richer emotional palette, and his scenes with Dr. Hickenlooper (101-103) and Dinah (66-68) provide the material's most genuinely moving moments. Midge functions as Augie's mirror — "two catastrophically wounded people" (70) — and her self-awareness about her failures as a mother gives her dimension, though her arc is more stated than demonstrated. Stanley is a beautifully realized supporting character whose blunt affection ("I never loved you" / "you need me") provides both comedy and emotional gravity (12, 77). The three sisters operate as a collective comic-mythic force rather than individual characters, which is effective within the ensemble design. The five teenagers are well-differentiated through their inventions and speech patterns, though Clifford's daredevil tic becomes slightly mechanical by its fourth iteration (75).

CONFLICT — Fair

The central external conflict — the alien encounter and resulting quarantine — is deliberately low-stakes in conventional terms: no one is in physical danger, no villain schemes, and the alien itself is benign. The real conflict is internal and distributed across the ensemble: Augie's inability to grieve or connect, Woodrow's search for cosmic meaning in the wake of personal loss, and the collective struggle of characters who have witnessed something inexplicable and must continue living without understanding it. This design means scene-level conflict often takes the form of witty friction rather than dramatic confrontation — J.J. versus Sandy about their children's projects (29-35), the parents versus the military about the quarantine (90-92), Ricky versus the detectives (65-66). The most potent conflict is the quietest: Augie's resistance to his own emotions, dramatized through his conversation with Stanley about abandonment (78) and his reflexive deflection in every exchange with Midge. The riot scene (105-106) provides the material's only burst of physical conflict, and it functions more as cathartic release than as escalation toward a climactic confrontation. The alien's return and redeposit of the meteorite (104-105) resolves the external mystery by deepening it rather than answering it, which is thematically consistent but leaves the conflict structure without a traditional pressure-release valve.

DIALOGUE — Excellent

The dialogue is the material's most consistently accomplished element, achieving character differentiation through rhythm, register, and subtext with remarkable precision. Augie's clipped, almost monosyllabic responses — "Uh-huh" repeated across multiple scenes (21, 69-70) — create a distinctive voice of emotional withdrawal that contrasts sharply with Midge's performative self-awareness ("I prefer to play abused, tragic alcoholics," 42) and Stanley's wry philosophical bluntness ("I never loved you," 12). Montana's dialect work ("I figger this here alien come from a tribe we don't know nothin' 'bout," 73-74) is precisely calibrated — folksy without condescension, its wisdom embedded in vernacular. The teenagers' dialogue is particularly well-handled: the memory game sequence (36-39) reveals intelligence without making the characters interchangeable, and Woodrow's "Ha-ha" after mentioning his mother's death (32) is a devastating line that conveys more about grief than any explicit statement could. The Quicky-Griddle exchange between Augie and the director (53) plants a motif that pays off across the entire narrative. The weakest dialogue moments occur in the metatheatrical frame, where the Host's narration occasionally over-explains connections that the audience could infer ("Often, it is the unexpected human connections which lead to the surprises of artistic discovery," 54).

PACING — Poor

The material's pacing is deliberate by design, prioritizing accumulation of detail and emotional texture over narrative urgency, which produces both its meditative power and its structural drag. The opening fifteen pages move efficiently through setup, but the stretch between the alien's first visit (48-49) and the quarantine consequences (62-66) is interrupted by the longest metatheatrical sequence (49-61), which — while containing the material's most theatrical writing — breaks momentum at precisely the moment when the desert narrative should be accelerating. The quarantine section (62-106) contains the material's richest character work but proceeds at a uniform tempo: scene after scene of conversational exchange at roughly the same emotional register, without sufficient variation in intensity. The riot (105-106) arrives as a welcome release of kinetic energy. The final twelve pages (106-118) present a different pacing challenge: the metatheatrical sequences (the actor's crisis, the alley encounter, the chanting classroom) and the desert denouement (the burial, the breakfast, the departure) run in parallel but neither builds to a climax, creating a gentle fade rather than a conclusive final beat. The freight train bookends (6, 118) provide satisfying structural symmetry.

TONE — Good

The tone maintains a precise and unusual register throughout — deadpan melancholy laced with absurdist comedy and genuine emotional vulnerability — and the material almost never loses control of this balance. The Tupperware burial scenes (42-44, 114-115) exemplify the tonal achievement: children's magical thinking about death treated with complete seriousness, producing moments that are simultaneously funny, heartbreaking, and bizarre without any single quality undermining the others. The atom bomb tests function as tonal punctuation — casual apocalypse treated as background noise (9, 118) — that mirrors the characters' dissociation from overwhelming events. The metatheatrical frame introduces a cooler, more intellectual register that occasionally creates productive friction with the warmer desert scenes but sometimes arrests emotional engagement: the Schubert Green/Polly sequence (59-61) achieves genuine pathos, while the Host's expository narration can feel distancing. The one moment where tone becomes genuinely uncertain is the actor's crisis backstage (107-108), where the repetition of "Good!" by the director risks reading as either profound or glib depending entirely on performance — a tonal gamble that the page alone cannot fully resolve.

ORIGINALITY — Good

The metatheatrical structure — a television broadcast about a play that itself contains a science-fiction narrative about an alien encounter, with periodic glimpses of the creative process behind both — is a distinctive formal invention, though its closest antecedents include Synecdoche, New York (art mirroring and consuming life) and Thornton Wilder's Our Town (theatrical self-consciousness as a lens for examining mortality). The 1950s atomic-age setting populated by child geniuses and deadpan adults occupies territory familiar from Anderson's own prior work, and the ensemble-of-eccentrics-in-a-contained-setting structure echoes numerous predecessors from The Grand Budapest Hotel to Clue. What distinguishes the execution is the specific intersection of grief narrative and alien encounter: the alien functions not as threat or wonder but as a cosmic interruption that mirrors the incomprehensibility of death, and the material's refusal to explain either event — the alien's motives or the meaning of Augie's burned hand — constitutes a genuine thematic commitment rather than a narrative evasion. The "You can't wake up if you don't fall asleep" chant, emerging organically from improvisation and becoming the material's thesis statement, is a fresh and effective climactic device.

LOGIC — Fair

The material establishes clear internal rules for both its desert world and its metatheatrical frame and largely adheres to them, though the relationship between the two layers contains deliberate ambiguity that occasionally strains coherence. The quarantine protocols follow logically from the alien encounter, and the government's behavior — classification, examination, attempted cover-up — is plausible within the 1950s Cold War context (62-66). Ricky's ability to break the story via a spliced phone line (82-84) is a minor convenience but is given sufficient setup through the earlier telephone booth scenes. The mechanic's mysterious car assembly being brought to the crater re-enactment (80) as a potential alien artifact is a charming loose end that the material wisely leaves unresolved. The more significant logic question concerns the metatheatrical frame: the actor playing Augie exits through the painted backdrop mid-performance (106), encounters the director backstage, then the actress from a different show in an alley, all while supposedly missing his cue — yet the timeline and spatial relationships between these events are intentionally fluid rather than realistic. This fluidity is consistent with the material's theatrical logic but means the frame device operates on dream-logic rather than causal logic, which is a feature rather than a flaw but may test some readers' patience. The alien's return to deposit the inventoried meteorite (104-105) raises questions the material deliberately refuses to answer, which is structurally sound given the thematic framework.

CRAFT — Excellent

The writing operates at a high level of literary precision, with action description that is dense with specific visual detail yet almost never overwritten — each image earns its place through contributing to character, tone, or world. The character introductions are exemplary: Augie's description includes his "excess of self-conscious/actorly business" (7), which simultaneously characterizes both the character and the actor playing him, a meta-textual efficiency that rewards close reading. The parenthetical stage directions embedded within dialogue — "(almost inaudible)" (8), "(excruciatingly)" (18), "(hopeful/resigned/determined)" (41) — function as precise emotional notation that guides performance without dictating it. The formatting employs several unconventional devices effectively: the NOTE asides to the reader (7, 14, 62), the INSERT cuts (15, 96), and the SPLIT-SCREEN designations (11, 82) all serve clarity. The transition between color widescreen and black-and-white is handled cleanly each time, with the tonal shift signaled by the change in visual register. The action lines achieve remarkable economy when cataloguing the chaos of the riot scene (105-106), managing to track a dozen simultaneous actions without losing spatial coherence. Minor craft issues: the parenthetical character descriptions occasionally grow dense enough to slow reading pace, and the "(more)" notations at some page breaks appear to be formatting artifacts (24, 38, 50) rather than intentional content.

OVERALL — Recommend

Asteroid City is a metatheatrical ensemble drama set in a 1950s desert town where an alien encounter during a children's science competition forces a quarantine that traps a group of grieving, gifted, and emotionally guarded characters in intimate proximity with each other and their own unprocessed pain. The material's greatest strengths are its dialogue — which differentiates a large ensemble with precision and achieves genuine subtext — and its tonal control, which sustains a demanding balance of deadpan comedy, absurdist whimsy, and authentic grief across 118 pages. The craft of the writing is consistently excellent, with action description that builds a vivid and specific world. The weakest elements are structural: the late inciting incident, the metatheatrical interruptions that break momentum at critical junctures, and a final act that dissolves rather than resolves. The deliberate refusal of narrative satisfaction — embodied in Augie's repeated "I still don't understand the play" — is the material's central artistic gamble: it is thematically coherent and emotionally honest, but it asks the audience to accept bewilderment as catharsis. The ensemble is rich but distributed, meaning no single character's arc carries sufficient weight to anchor the emotional experience independently. This is material of considerable ambition and intelligence that demands a specific sensibility from its audience — one willing to sit with mystery rather than resolution — and rewards that sensibility generously.

Get this level of coverage for your screenplay

Every coverage includes 10 category ratings, an overall recommendation, and detailed analysis — powered by the same methodology used by talent agencies and literary managers.

Movie data provided by TMDB